Thursday Nov 28, 2024
Wednesday, 11 April 2018 00:00 - - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe after defeating the No-Confidence Motion against him by the Joint Opposition first paid homage to the Triple Gem at Gangaramaya Temple and later addressed the media. He said that the foremost thing now for the Government was to get closer to the people.
In the past two-and-a-half years there were initiatives like giving free laptop computers and tabs and creating more infrastructure support for IT with WIFI connectivity, which has not gone well for Government given the resounding response of the masses during the recent council elections. So how can the Government get closer to the people?
The population of nearly 21 million people in our nation can be divided into 30% and 100%. This may sound rather silly because if there is one 30% then the balance is 70%. But the 30% here are the farmers who make our food to keep our stomachs full and the 100% all of us who are consumers in some form or other. This Government has two-a-and-half years’ time to make the 30% farmers happy and with that a happy nation, how?
Without our farmers we will have to starve. We can walk without motorised transport, wear basic clothing and have simple abodes, but cannot do without food. We cannot have a 25% full tummy because it will scream all the time. In the Ariyawansa Sutra, the four basic needs given are clothing, food, abode and meditation.
On one early morning the Enlightened One surveying the world with compassion observed that a certain village farmer had the merits to attain Stream-Entry (Sothapaththi). The Buddha went to that village and the villagers offered alms to Buddha. The farmer woke early in the morning and finding that his herd of cattle was not in the cattle shed, went into the jungle looking for them. Despite looking for them for hours and not finding the cattle, he decided to come to the place where the Buddha was and sat in a far corner to listen to Dhamma. However, the Buddha told a Bhikku to give the farmer some food as it was of no purpose to teach Dhamma to a person with an empty stomach.
In the next two-and-a-half years, the Government can not only moot this change in the prosperity of farmers but the prosperity of the nation as a whole and assure itself victory again in the next elections as a happy farming community and consumers not burdened by the middlemen who manipulate farm gate and consumer prices will fall behind those who brought happiness and prosperity to them.
The global escalation of commodity prices in the latter part of last decade impacted Sri Lanka’s rice market, with retail prices showing sharp increases for the consumer. The regulatory forces with ceiling on consumer prices and guaranteed price for paddy did alleviate this problem to some extent. The long drought and the subsequent floods impacted paddy cultivation. This also highlights the need to augment the water retaining capacity of lakes by de-silting the lakes so that more rain water could be retained. Despite various plans to even export rice, the farmers who are the primary producers are not able to get even the guaranteed price for their paddy.
In the vegetable sector too problems are brewing with farmers not being able to sell their produce even at rock bottom prices and having to dump truckloads of vegetables in garbage dumps. On the other side consumers are forced to dish out more and more money for the daily essentials.
Nature too has not been kind to us. In early 2014 we experienced drought conditions in paddy and vegetable growing areas with tanks drying up. This was followed immediately afterwards by incessant rains, which caused heavy floods and wiped out a huge quantity of paddy which was held in storage with the farmers. Then in 2017 came the drought again in the cultivation areas.
Indeed, in 2015 a local TV channel in their evening news gave an insight into how officials are flouting the guaranteed price, in this case for onions, with the connivance of certain unscrupulous traders depriving the farmer of his just income. In late 2014 the potato farmers went up in arms in Welimada. TV footage showed how angry farmers thronged the premises of authorities demanding a better price for their produce. The drought in 2017 dealt a severe blow to paddy and vegetable production as well as coconut cultivation.
We have this happening time and time again, one day it is the tomato famer, then next the potato farmer and so on. But the problem becomes very acute due to absence of a food security policy and empowering the farmer to own the value chain of rice and vegetables from farm gate to consumer. Thus it is evident that Sri Lanka is in need of a mechanism to develop the market for agricultural products in a sustainable manner, free from the clutches of officials and politicians.
Underpinning the failings of these sectors are a range of issues emanating from the limitation on storage for paddy procured at guaranteed price, a sustainable return for the farmers and the inefficiencies and inequalities in the current system. Thus the future calls for a process from the field to the plate on the table where the influencers and the beneficiaries are the actual stakeholders.
Strategic analysis of the problem therefore needs to look at both the current situation as well as look to the best international practices in order to devise a new and better strategic direction for the future.
The proposed solution is no stranger to this country. Multinational companies which are engaged in paddy cultivation in Sri Lanka already practice these strategies from cultivation to processing, packaging, branding and marketing the branded end product. The farmers of this nation who are citizens surely must have a better say than the foreign multinational companies. Similar strategies can be implemented in the vegetable and other perishable sectors. It only sets out to contribute to a paradigm shift in the thinking and policy development in the agricultural sector.
Nearly 30% of the population of Sri Lanka are involved in farming with the majority of these engaged in rice farming. The farming community in the country is primarily from the poorer segment of the society. As an economically disadvantaged group, they lack effective organisation, leadership skills and representation at a political level. Lack of strength and effective voice means the community is dependent on the others, many of whom have different agendas and interests.
With an economy so dependent on the rice crop, to ignore the needs for proper, fair and equitable support and policies for the farming community is to endanger the very stability of society and adding further trouble to an already economically challenged country. What is needed is a bottom-up approach to planning rather than the traditional incumbent of a top-down system. This is true of the sector irrespective of the geographical location within the country. Leadership from within needs to be developed, coerced and encouraged.
Weaknesses
No say in end consumer price
Proxy producer for middle man
Opportunities
Threats
Goal: Achieve independence, acquire authority and influence in the production and processing of paddy and marketing, distribution and revenue optimisation of rice and rice products.
Overall objective: Develop industry co-ops or public companies where the ownership is by the farmer at regional levels based on growing areas. Such structures will manage the affairs of purchasing, processing and marketing bringing a ROI to all stakeholders. It will benefit the government too by enabling the sector to become self-reliant and increasing the attractiveness of farming. In a wider sphere it will contribute to national growth and better wealth distribution.
The starting point will be creating and nominating central organising committees based on growing areas/regions with representation from across the rice farming community of those areas/regions in the country. The members of these committees will be tasked with educating and creating awareness among the rice farmer why the initiative of cooperation and asserting ownership makes sense. This will include;
Creating support
Use of funds
Distribution and marketing
In the vegetable sector, it is a well-known fact that due to crude packaging and transport strategies large quantities of vegetables perish. In 2013 the previous Government tried to bring in a policy of packing in baskets when transporting as opposed to gunny bags with disastrous results. The failure of the initiative was solely due to the inability of authorities to understand the principle of the rights of the people and absence of choice. What the then Trade Ministry people should have done was to give a choice and leave the transporter to decide based on mutual benefits.
With the farmer community being in charge of the whole sector as opposed to middlemen and to increase the yield in the utilisation of vegetables it is proposed that a twofold approach be adopted namely:
The fundamental in revenue management of perishable assets is the revenue opportunity cost of the next unit of inventory or EMR (Expected Marginal Revenue). EMR is the probability of selling the next unit of inventory. If the probability is low, then the end consumer price too will be low. In the rice market, with bumper harvests there will inevitably be pressure on the end consumer price of rice. While the consumer is benefited, the drawback will be the downward pressure on the price of paddy at the farm gate which will eventually result in cutback in the farming acreage in the next season.Unlike in the case of fixed inventory capacity such as airlines, hotels, cruise liners where the inventory subordinate table is built taking into account the market segmentation for optimisation of revenue (unless utilised at the time of departure or on the day of occupation the inventory will perish) the same cannot be applied in the case of commodities such as rice or vegetables where the marginal unit could determine the price if overproduced.
Therefore, strategic plans need to be in place to ensure there is optimal production with the farmer obtaining a better price, without exploiting the consumer. Some of the strategies could be
This will likely be a combination of guaranteed prices for products supplied plus distribution of dividends at agreed intervals throughout the year. Within the structure, the new organisations may decide to set aside funds annually to establish and create an effective pension fund/EPF for the members. Over time, the financial strength of the organisation should be such that it will be in position to provide financing to the members on preferential terms to that of banks and current financial businesses.
Further after a tax holiday period, the organisations could be taxed on their profits generating income to the government.
Developing an Information and Communication Technology Strategy – ICT
There is need for the organisations to develop rice and other allied products commerce data. The new organisations may wish to consider making use of already existing resources within the community or develop their own resource centres for upkeep of all data;
(The writer can be reached via [email protected].)
The new organisations will adopt gradual and systematic process of implementing research and acquiring new knowledge to upgrade the rice crop in respect of quality, varieties and volumes. This will include;
There are number of other areas where the new organisations can play an important role. This could include provision of farming experts to help increase production in underperforming regions and ensuring effective water management.
The activities of the new organisations could well develop to buying beyond the production of its members. Further the organisations will need to have the infrastructure in place to deal with disputes, issues and problems within the farming community and its members.
Further after an initial gestation period the organisations could be quoted in the stock exchange with members being allowed to sell a certain percentage of their shares in the exchange.
Let the whole nation open eyes and see the plight of the farmers. Like the birds being freed from the net, let us free the farmers from the net of poverty, unhappiness and debt so that they reach the destination of peace and happiness because their happiness will be the nation’s happiness.
All agricultural strategies in all sectors will have little impact if focus is not directed to food security. In the developed world food security is part of the national agenda. Japan is a good example where due to influence of the rice farmer, rice imports are banned except in processed forms. Rice production is also subsidised by the Government which aggravated trade friction between Japan and USA. The Japanese position is that self-sufficiency in rice production is important for food security.
The EU is another good example of how food security is seen by the community. In fact, all developed nations have food security at the highest importance in national development. By building economic strength of the farming community, Sri Lanka can create food security and ensure that the fleecing of the consumer by the middlemen will not take place.
The Prime Minister now has the power and the support to bring this change for the farmers and consumers benefit, and what better time than now?