Empty rhetoric with dangerous consequences

Monday, 3 June 2024 00:29 -     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

United National Party General Secretary Palitha Range Bandara suggested recently that a referendum be held to extend the term of the President and Parliament for two more years. Many have taken this statement as nothing more than a joke expressed by an individual with little credibility in the political arena. Despite the UNP today having only a single seat in Parliament, its leader is the president of the country. Therefore, such utterances well within the purview of free speech definitely should not be taken lightly. 

When the current administration has violated the Constitution and postponed local government and provincial elections indefinitely, it is not a simple matter if there are sections within the regime that are looking at postponing the presidential and parliamentary elections.

In the democratic tapestry of Sri Lanka, the regular holding of elections is a fundamental thread which had been maintained even during the most precarious times. This move, reminiscent of the authoritarian tendencies during J.R. Jayewardene’s era, not only contradicts democratic values but also risks plunging the nation into political and constitutional turmoil.

Ranil Wickremesinghe, who has long been a significant figure in Sri Lankan politics, now faces a critical test of leadership. Any contemplations of delaying the elections is viewed by many as an attempt to extend political power at the expense of democratic norms. Such a decision would be a betrayal of the trust placed in the Government by its citizens, effectively silencing their voice and denying them their franchise.

Democracy is built on the regular and predictable occurrence of elections, providing a platform for accountability and a peaceful transition of power. Postponing elections disrupts this cycle, eroding public trust and breeding cynicism towards the political system. It sends a dangerous message that democratic processes can be manipulated to suit the interests of those in power, undermining the very foundations of our republic.

The precedent set by J.R. Jayewardene in 1984, when he extended the term of Parliament through a controversial referendum, should serve as a cautionary tale. That period saw increased centralisation of power, weakening of democratic institutions, and erosion of public trust. Sri Lanka cannot afford to repeat such a mistake. The long-term damage to the country’s democratic fabric and international reputation would be profound.

Moreover, delaying elections would likely lead to political chaos and a constitutional crisis. The uncertainty and instability that would ensue could create a power vacuum, fostering an environment ripe for corruption and maladministration. In such a scenario, governance would become erratic and ineffective, further alienating the citizenry and deteriorating public faith in political institutions.

The disenfranchisement and frustration among the populace, deprived of their democratic rights, could easily spill over into protests and civil disorder. This not only threatens national peace and stability but also endangers the lives and livelihoods of ordinary citizens. The spectre of violence looms large, and the potential for widespread unrest could drive Sri Lanka into a state of turmoil. 

In conclusion, any suggestions to postpone presidential or parliamentary elections through a referendum is a perilous path that must be avoided. It strikes at the heart of democratic values, denies citizens their right to franchise, and paves the way for political chaos, constitutional crisis, and potential violence. The long-term damage to public trust in the political system is incalculable. Sri Lanka must remain steadfast in its commitment to democratic principles and ensure that elections are held as scheduled. The health and future of our democracy depend on it.

COMMENTS