Thai govt wants amnesty to let Thaksin return – reports

Thursday, 17 November 2011 00:00 -     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

Reuters: Thailand’s government has put forward proposals for an amnesty for convicts that seem designed to allow self-exiled former premier Thaksin Shinawatra to return home without serving a sentence for abuse of power, Thai media reported on Wednesday.

The proposed amnesty was agreed at a cabinet meeting on Tuesday, media said. No mention was made of it in a statement after the meeting and ministers have declined to comment.

“Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra was not present at the meeting and all officials were asked to leave the room when the issue was deliberated,” the Bangkok Post daily said, citing sources at Government House, the prime minister’s office.

Yingluck is Thaksin’s sister and is widely seen as his proxy at the head of his ruling Puea Thai Party.

The cabinet proposals, which would be put to the king to be endorsed for an amnesty around his birthday on Dec. 5, would cover people over 60 years of age sentenced to under three years in prison, the Post said.

Thaksin, 62, was convicted of abuse of power in 2008 and fled before a two-year sentence was handed down. He never spent any time in jail and lives in Dubai, traveling frequently on passports granted by Montenegro and Nicaragua following the cancellation of his Thai passports.

The newspaper said Yingluck was absent from the cabinet meeting apparently because transport complications caused her to spend Monday night in a flood-hit province she had visited during the day, although it quoted a military source as saying she could have come back to Bangkok by helicopter.

Yingluck had little political experience before leading Puea Thai to an election landslide on July 3. From the moment she took office in August, critics said she had been installed by Thaksin to help bring him home a free man.

Thaksin, a telecommunications tycoon-turned-populist politician, was ousted by the military in a coup in 2006 and remains a divisive figure in Thai politics.

His “red shirt” supporters paralysed parts of Bangkok from March to May last year in an attempt to oust the previous government, before the military moved in to crush their protests. At least 91 people were killed and 1,800 wounded.

Deputy Prime Minister Chalerm Yubamrung, a staunch ally of Thaksin, sidestepped questions about the amnesty and said no decision had been made.

“I cannot say anything now because it was a confidential meeting but I confirm that the government will not break the law,” he told reporters.

Some eligibility criteria change from one amnesty to another, but those convicted of corruption, which would apply to Thaksin, or drug offences are normally not freed.

The Post said the draft amnesty this time did not exclude corruption.



Pirapan Salirathavibhaga, a former Justice Minister of the previous Democrat-let government, said amnesties should only apply for those who actually served time behind bars.

“If we cut this issue off, it could mean that every wrongdoer, including a fugitive, can be whitewashed,” Pirapan told Reuters. “It would benefit those fugitives who fled charges without going to jail, which is not right.”



The possibility of Thaksin having his criminal record expunged is likely to anger many Thais, particularly the urban middle classes and elites, who see him as a corrupt crony capitalist but are unable to keep him at bay due to the huge electoral support for his parties over the past decade.



An anti-Thaksin group, Network of Citizen Volunteers Protection the Land, issued a statement on Wednesday saying it would challenge any such amnesty and launch a petition.



But with the government’s control of parliament and the bureaucracy and its support among the red shirts, opposition voices may not be loud enough to derail any amnesty.



“From the government’s perspective, now is the right timing for this move,” said Somjai Phagaphasvivat, a political scientist at Bangkok’s Thammasat University.



“There is still strong discontent about Thaksin, but already the government has secured the upper hand, in all areas. It was elected with the overwhelming support of the public and its opponents are all in a weak position now.”

COMMENTS