Tuesday Nov 26, 2024
Thursday, 27 February 2020 00:00 - - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}
By Jeevan Thiagarajah
The Sri Lankan conflict is a tragic story of exclusivist identity politics, deep-rooted party rivalries, grave imbalances in the sharing of political power and repeated failures of efforts at resolution and mediation.
In the newly-emerging democracy, Sri Lanka’s post-independence English -speaking elites sought to respond and contain the electoral pressures with political ideologies which were ethno-centric, promoting the interests of their own ethnic constituency. They left little space for a multi-ethnic inclusive national identity.
The Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission
During the visit of the UN Secretary General in May 2009, President Mahinda Rajapaksa and the Secretary-General agreed that addressing the aspirations and grievances of all communities and working towards a lasting political solution was fundamental to ensuring long-term socio-economic development.
The Secretary-General welcomed the assurance of the President of Sri Lanka contained in his Statement in Parliament on 19 May 2009 that a national solution acceptable to all sections of people will be evolved. President Mahinda Rajapaksa appointed by Proclamation dated 15 May 2010, the Commission on Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation (LLRC) to support the drive towards national unity and reconciliation.
The mandate
To inquire and report on the following matters that may have taken place during the period between 21 February 2002 and 19 May 2009, namely;
Select thematic areas focused by the commission
International Humanitarian aw issues
In the representations made before the Commission, there were four main areas involving the discharge of humanitarian obligations of the State which were scrutinised by the Commission. Viz.
(i) Obligation to educate the members of the armed forces in the relevant aspects of Human Rights (HR) and International Humanitarian Law
(ii) Measures to safeguard civilians/avoid civilian casualties during military operations;
(iii) Supply of humanitarian relief, including food and medicine to civilians in conflict areas; and
(iv) Conduct of the security forces during the movement of civilians and combatants to cleared areas.
Human rights
Human rights issues arising from the conflict were categorised as follows:
Return and resettlement
Land restitution: Policy, methodology and assistance was analysed under the following areas and recommendations made in accordance:
Reconciliation
LLRC points out that the main instruments of reconciliation will be the initiatives and measures taken to address the issues that have been listed. If these initiatives and measures are to be effective as instruments of reconciliation, the values, goals and attitudes that guide the implementation will be crucial.
The National Plan of Action (NPoA)
In order to take forward the Recommendations made in the LLRC Report, the Cabinet of Ministers, in May 2012, assigned the Secretary to the President to monitor implementation of the recommendations made in the Report of the Commission. Accordingly, a National Plan of Action (NPoA) was prepared to monitor the implementation of the Recommendations of the Commission following several rounds of consultation with key implementing agencies. This National Plan of Action was approved by the Cabinet of Ministers in July 2012.
The LLRC Report identified 135 recommendations categorised under five broad themes as follows:
(This writer himself was an invitee to a panel which defined the National Action Plan for the LLRC at the behest of the then President. He lasted one meeting and was never invited again on account of personal rancour on the part of the head of the group! We do not know at the time of writing this piece the nature and shape of proposals our delegation will table at the ongoing sessions in Geneva. Suffice to say we are neither short of knowledge nor institutional memory notwithstanding the language that maybe used by the Government in office.)
Milestones
Language Policy
School-based Second National Language Policy – A comprehensive school based Second National Language Policy being devised.
9.257 – Ensure public universities have ethnically mixed students. Populations with a choice of courses offered in all three languages.
i.Implementation of student and staff exchange programmes among universities.
ii.Conduct trilingual degree courses in all universities to cater to needs of development, national harmony and peace based activities with special reference to the trilingual teaching need in school system.
iii.Include the subject of national harmony as a credit course in all degrees in universities.
iv.Make acquiring proficiency in Tamil a prerequisite for confirmation in the post for Sinhala employees and vice versa (discussions being held to issue a circular to all universities in this regard).
v.Make proficiency in Tamil a prerequisite to qualify for a degree by Sinhala students and vice versa with the new enrolments.
Grant credit to students with proficiency in Sinhala/Tamil when it is not their mother tongue when admitting student to universities under the special intake.
The reason for highlighting work undertaken by the Government in 2014 is to emphasise we had an active reconciliation policy at work. The two highlighted examples show serious intent. Recommendation 9.257 is sterling to say the least.
Whilst the present Government may have its own views on commitments made by the previous Government at the UN human Rights Council it could do well to show what they had set place before they left Government in 2015. Unfortunately key policymakers are unlikely to be fully briefed by those in our bureaucracy of the enormous work undertaken in Government.