IATA expects nearly half of all air travel to touch Asia Pacific Region by 2034
Monday, 24 November 2014 00:00
-
- {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}
IATA has identified continuous safety enhancement, the availability of cost-efficient infrastructure and environmental responsibility as critical factors to ensure that Asia Pacific continues to realise the enormous economic and social benefits of air connectivity.
“It is no understatement to say that air connectivity underpins modern economies. Aviation and aviation-enabled tourism accounts for over 24 million jobs and over $ 500 billion in economic activity across the Asia Pacific region. And that contribution has tremendous potential to grow,” said Tony Tyler, IATA’s Director General and CEO in a keynote address to the Association of Asia Pacific Airlines Assembly of Presidents in Tokyo, Japan.
Globally some 3.3 billion passengers are expected to board flights this year, and that number is expected to grow to 7.3 billion by 2034. Taking into account connecting flights that consists of some 2.8 billion journeys today, growing to 6.1 billion by 2034; by 2034 IATA expects that nearly half of all air travel (some 2.9 billion journeys) will touch the Asia Pacific region (up from around 40% today). Over the next 20 years, Asia Pacific is expected to account for about two-thirds of global growth.
“Aviation is an industry with tremendous potential. Asia Pacific is leading the industry’s growth. But there will be challenges to become ever safer, to provide cost-efficient infrastructure and to ensure environmental responsibility,” said Tyler.
Safety
“Flying is safe. But, on very rare occasions, accidents do happen. In 2013 there were 16 fatal accidents among 36.4 million commercial flights. And the two tragic accidents involving Malaysia Airlines this year are a sad reminder that safety is always a constant and ever-evolving challenge,” said Tyler.
The IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) is a good example of the industry’s commitment to continuous improvements. The global standard has been adopted by some 400 airlines globally, including all 240 IATA carriers for which it is a condition of membership. Enhanced IOSA turns this biennial snapshot of an airline’s operational safety practices into a continuous monitoring program. By September 2015 all IATA airlines will migrate to the Enhanced IOSA program.
Tyler also urged greater participation in IATA’s Flight Data Analysis and Flight Data Exchange programs.
“Data will drive much of our advancements in safety. The more that we collect and analyse, the better we will become at driving safety forward,” said Tyler.
Along with encouraging individual participation by airlines, Tyler endorsed an initiative of the Asia-Pacific Regional Aviation Safety Group (which brings together 20 governments and 12 international organisations, including IATA) to use IATA’s Flight Data Exchange platform to share critical safety information.
Infrastructure
Keeping pace with expected growth will be a challenge for infrastructure. This is being addressed with some $ 3 billion earmarked for improvements in air traffic capacity and management. IATA is a strong supporter of the Seamless Asian Sky initiative that will facilitate growth in a very common-sense way—by ensuring inter-operability across the region and with adjacent airspace. In parallel, IATA is working closely with Chinese authorities to ease airspace congestion. It also supports the redesign of airspace at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport that will increase capacity taking into consideration that modern aircraft are some 70% quieter than those of the early jet age.
Asia Pacific is home to many world class hub airports. As governments continue to pursue airport expansion programs across the region, Tyler called for caution when engaging private sector financing.
“Private capital is not a panacea. To be successful it must have a strong governance structure embedded in regulation that keeps the consumer in mind when setting parameters on price and quality. It must set reasonable expectations on returns – in line with airports being public utilities, not hedge fund investments. There must also be reasonable limits for any royalty or concession-fee collected by the government. And the governance structure must institutionalise robust cost-benefit analysis and user consultation in the evaluation of capital expenditure plans,” said Tyler.